modest cost for "L" series, wonderful optics and fast speed, nitpicking, but not a circular aperature and no weather sealing. when you hold the lens in your hand you know you are holding a fine peice of optical equipment. You will see why. Some real life images from my photoblog: http://hellabella.de, One of the best and sharpest lens around. Canon 135mm f/2 L Review - Ken Rockwell In general, prime telephotos should outperform zooms. Unfortunately it is not manufactured in a multicoated version, and produces prominent internal reflection artifacts on very bright stars. (purchased for $900), reviewed November 2nd, 2015 Camera tech for video has come a long way in recent years, with faster autofocus, subject tracking, eye tracking and smarter lenses that stabilize the frame. Sharp without being harsh. How well do Fujifilm's film simulations match up to their film counterparts? You get what you get.#4: Cat in Underbrush.That's pretty good.#5: Woman with Blanket.It's like a snapshot. Still, what a time to be an enthusiast/photog, so many nice options. If the title had been: "Testing My First Telephoto and LOVING IT!!!!!!!. And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). Let's unbox, review and test this lens to find out why it is one of the best bang for your buck deals in astrophotography! There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. Read on to find out which you should be using and why! Yes, it is about the same as 85mm f/1.4 blur factor is 60mm, while 135mm f/2 blur factor is 67mm. http://www.astrovale-f-2/index.html, Hi Lord_Vader, We take OM System's new 90mm prime F3.5 macro lens out and about around Seattle, in search of sunlight, people and very tiny things to get up close and personal with. When stopped down to 37mm, F5.4, it is almost identical to the Takumar except that on highly enlarged images it shows a hint of coma in the distant corners. "If you are a Nikon user, of course have a look at the Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC and compare it to the other lenses mentioned in this article. I have the Sony SaL 135F1.8 Zeiss Lens and think that is excellent. enlarge. I want to see the bokeh and the sharpness at 100% mag, don't care about the photos. The 135 f/2 is not perfect. He's better than I am on BS, I got to give him that. this lens typifies modern design being confined to sharpness, colour & bokeh. The first example is good to show that you can take photos of persons in front of an ugly background without completely ruining the shot (important for people shooting events), the last one is the only one I really like (because of the color) but you could shoot this with any lens with short MFD. What next, an article extolling the virtues of 43mm, or 70mm? Used with a FF body the DOF can be unforgiving, but if you nail focus the results can be magnificent. The background blur is amazingly creamy with this lens. That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. Personally, I can't stand these circles, and I see them as VERY distracting.Lots of fads come and go, and this is just another one of these fads that some photographers are obsessed with. As in all arts the client's likes influence the result up to a point. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. I also find the other photos not very good. How's that for an endorsement? For my purposes, this is a spectacular lens. My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! I really wanted to use, and like, a 135mm f2 lens so I bought the Canon version. Could use a few updates. But I hardly used it in the 30+ years. OK guysTOS rule number one "Posts that are not respectful of other individuals (be they members or not) are not welcome here.". My guidescope is a 5in F5 Jaeger's achromat with a 2.3x Barlow, and a 9mm illuminated reticle eyepiece. A Canon 70-200L IS II at 200mm at f2.8 has all the same characteristics of the Canon 135L. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC lens. But in the rush to make hybrids why are aren't we giving video shooters the tools they need? The aperture ring is marked with each f-stop, and you need to manually click through F/2 F/22 and watch the blades do their work. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. I found with the 70-200 made me lazy. No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. I use it routinely in preference to many other multicoated filters I tested, including the new Hoya MC UV. One thing I am most stun is its AF performance. It could really use an update to its coatings. Why take a step back from 250 to sit between the RedCat and the 24-105? Im currently shooting with a Canon 60D. This lens is very sharp, corner to corner wide open. Show some humility and don't troll. wew.. Now I have only the Nikon but I can try to take a photo of the same subject fully open Finally, to prevent image shift during exposure, all telephoto lenses must be supported at two points: at the camera end, and at the far end with a large retaining ring. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. Big F-value.Light. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens from Samyang is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and most telephoto applications. But the Rokinon f/2 version fits into a different market. They're heavy, and expensive, but you can carry one lens instead of three, and can vary the compression and field of view to a significant degree - from nearly normal, to long portrait focal lengths. 21P Giacobini Zinner NGC1499 California Barnard 8 Cr399 Coathanger North America and Pelican Veil nebula HORGB M11 cluster area This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop using the aperture ring at the base of the lens. (purchased for $900). http://www.adstateagent.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.hitsticker.com, I love this lens. Imaging Resource 1998 - 2023. In the past, Ive covered a number of different lenses, from the Sigma 24mm F/1.4 to the Canon EF 300mm F/4L. If You can afford it, buy it! I shoot it wide open 90% of the time. This creates an effective focal length of roughly 200mm, a useful magnification for a wide variety of astro-imaging scenarios. Because of chromatic aberration, no telephoto lens can be used at full aperture. To actually learn to compose the photos so that the background complements the image instead of being something that must be blurred away. That's why I really enjoy shooting portraits with it. We were very impressed with X-T5's 40-megapixel APS-C sensor, check out some full resolution images! The flat lens hood design allows you to easily take flat frames with the Rokinon 135mm using the white t-shirt method or using a flat panel. Light falloff (vignetting) gets pretty high (0.73 EV wide open, but drops to 0.3 EV at f/2.8, and only 0.17 EV at f/4. http://www.idyll.com/laney2014 In these situations, a portable, wide-field imaging rig wins. I bought my lens in mint condition for $350 from Japan, but I see that some retailers are asking significantly more. thanks for the write-up.. i just got this lens and have just been trying it out. The thing is, on my APS-C body the 100mm is challenging enough. So so far the best that I have used are the 200f2.8L and the 400f5.6L. This new, affordable wide zoom for L-mount is capable of some excellent landscapes. Hate these presumptuous kinds of articles and headlines. We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. As soon as e.g. The logic of this article can be applied to a 200/2.8 as well. My only complaint about this lens is that the depth of the lens shade forces me to remove the shade in order to remove or replace the lens cap (my hands are fairly large). The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. I use it to photograph highschool basketball in poor light. As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. (purchased for $700), reviewed October 9th, 2012 Yes, there is some sharpness added when stopping down to f4 or f5.6 but after that it doesn't get better. Whereas quality apochromats can be corrected with broad band filters, such as the Astronomik UV/IR cut filter or the CLS-CCD filter, telephoto lenses can not. Some of the primes have a special look to them, but only the 70-200 is indispensable. I put quotes around the ones that are written on the lens. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. You can also find him as @mwroll on Instagram and 500px. 6 Reasons I Love the Canon 135mm f/2 Lens - YouTube Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. It turns out that this. Off topic, A lot of us have been saying this for years. When I was teaching photography in 70's at a junior college, I critiqued students photos, but I never did so harshly. If they could make 135 f2 lighter version with AF for Sony and price is slightly under Sigma 135 /1.8 and obviously Batis 135 2.8 it could sell like hotcakes. Images that sing. Thats quite a jump from 135mm, so the camera body you use with this lens may change the types of targets you shoot. Focal length is great. I do not see much difference in background blur or bokeh. F2 allows higher shutter speeds in lower light without raising the ISO. Canon 300/4 ED IF AF (non-IS) For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. $449.00. The 70-200L being a much more useful lens. Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. I owned this lens for a long time, then traded it for the 70-200 2.8IS II. It improves slightly stopped down. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. I have been following your work both on YT and here from Japan for a while. Simple fact is the Samyang 135/2 is a remarkably good lens for the price, and it offers a set of optical characteristics that typically cost 2-4x more. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. Prime means that this lens is fixed at 135mm, it is not a zoom lens that allows for focal length adjustments. This thing is a beast in comparison. Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. for sample photos and video tour, This is simply the best Canon prime lens that I have tested. FULL FRAME TELEPHOTO 135mm F2.0 A con is that it really makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. You may need to stop down to control star bloat, and thats exactly what Ive done with this 135. - in my subjects' skin. So, let's see where it falls short of perfection: Beautiful portrait lens. As it is it is earns a 9. The 135L is half the weight of the 70-200 2.8IS. BTW, the 300-mm Tele-Tessar you describe -- what camera was it made for? Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. Focusing a wide open F/2 lens is demanding of the optics, especially on a field of stars in the night sky. 24/28mm, 50mm, 100mm, 200mm. It allows to push your main subject matter into abstraction wide open and get very detailed images stopped down. In the right hands this lens really does have "magic pixie dust", as a friend once described. I have never had a bad experience buying used Canon lenses from eBay sellers with 99.5%+ positive feedback. My work requires auto-focus. I had both for a while. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. You got a criticism fine say it politely, and too the point. But like a glitch in the matrix, an anomaly that shouldn't exist, you can get the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm for as little as $430 brand new. Now we have to read this kind of ignorant misinformation on DPR articles. CAs: a little in the OOF area - not disturbing anyway. The presentation and hands-on look and feel of the 135mm F/2 lens is impressive considering the reasonable price of this lens. MCovington, my Zeiss 300/4 is the full thickness barrel version, made in West Germany, serial number 5990836. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty. By the way, I still enjoy using my very sharp Sears 135mm, PKA mount lens. Rokinon 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens (Canon EF) - B&H Photo Ive spent a handful of nights testing this lens in my Bortle Scale Class 6/7 backyard, and my results live up to the hype it gets in terms of astrophotography performance. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. If so, which one? All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. This way you get both lenses with only one! This allows for less aggressive camera settings for night photography such as using a lower ISO setting and shorter exposure. My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill). My goal for this article was to show some great example photos and share some ideas for projects this lens is a good fit for. I would love to see his test images. Meanwhile the ol' Canon 135/2 is still commanding a higher than average price on the used market (70%+ of MSRP isn't common), I guess the low weight and super easy resale have almost made it a high end commodity. Stage photography is another good use for the 135 L. Another drawback is the focal length. I stopped reading after the part where someone I don't know told me I "should" be doing something. But do some experimenting before you decide. Your Baader filter passes 420-680nm and, in theory, a good APO should be able to focus that part of the spectrum with no chromatic aberration. I thought I had to sell my 100/F2.8 macro L but thanks for letting me know I can keep it. Round one of polls are now open, pick your winners and share your voice. Lensrentals.com - Rent Lenses and Cameras from Canon, Nikon, Olympus An update to the Mini 11, the new camera adds parallax correction capabilities, automatic flash control and a multi-function twist lens. But you couldn't have because you don't know even as much as this guy. This lens is available on Amazon for most camera bodies. The clip-in Astronomik 12nm Ha is one of their most popular filters ever and for good reason! Moreover if we have a serendipitous moment regarding a new (or used) lens, that's a good thing. Most of the available 135mm F2 lenses have a very short minimum focusing distance in relation to the focal length, creating a magnification ratio of around 0.2 - 0.25. Used on a crop body the results are still splendid but you gain on DOF, making it a great combination for wedding/event and ambient/available light. At $900 US it a relative steal. If canon puts an IS on this lens, it would be perfect! @ Juksu - you're pathologically clueless. As rest you do just by cropping or stitching. Tamron has announced its 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD ultra-wide angle zoom will be made available for Fujifilm X-mount. This includes everything from the rich star fields of Sagittarius, to a complete look at the Andromeda Galaxy. They just wanted to increase their joy from photography. She doesn't look like she is there. If you want autofocus and great value for money, buy the Canon 135mm, as it has almost the image quality of the Samyang, and you can get it for under $1,000 new. Selecting between it and the 200mm Takumar was not an easy choice but, in the end, I chose the Takumar because it seemed to have slightly better contrast. My tests on it are described on http://pikespeakphoto.com/tests/canonlens135.html, i have never been a prime lens fan, just seems to leave you feeling trapped in a single dimension. I heard it's very sharp and well corrected. I really like how they augment my longer focal length scopes. Sharpness, contrast and the natural vignetting on full-frame cameras is awesome! I don't know about other photographers but I do not have many applications for this focal length. I would recommend buying it used if you want to save some money, with the added benefit that you can re-sell it at the same price as you bought it for, effectively giving you the opportunity to "rent it" for free.
Green Bay Ymca Babysitting Course, What Is Country Crock Made Of, Articles C